%20(1).svg "Frame (18) (1)")
.svg "Close (1)")
It has long been the ATO’s practice to treat a trust’s unpaid present entitlements (“UPE”) to a company as a loan for the purposes of Division 7A ITAA 1936 – that is, deemed to be an unfranked dividend unless a complying loan agreement was put in place to cover the unpaid amount.
The ATO re-affirmed their long-standing treatment of unpaid distributions in a recent tax determination (TD 2022/11).
A recent case (Bendel [2023] AAT 3074) decided in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (‘AAT”) rejected the ATO’s threshold basis for their current (TD 2022/11) and past taxation rulings (TR 2010/3).
The AAT decided, contrary to the ATO’s ruling, that for the purposes of Division 7A:
As of yet, the ATO have not announced their response to the AAT’s decision. Note that decisions of the AAT do not constitute a legal precedent which binds the ATO.
However, and to the extent that the AAT’s decision represents a contrary view to that of the ATO, the practical concern at the moment, is what actions should trustees and corporate beneficiaries undertake in relation to the 2023-year trust distributions which have not been paid by the trustee.
These actions could include:
The current situation is completely unsatisfactory, so it is to be hoped that the long anticipated legislative change will finally be introduced to provide some taxation certainty in relation to this very common commercial situation.
We're here to help
If you wish to receive further specific information or advice on the above please contact Daryl Corpe.
11 min read
Watching from the grand stand, it can be tempting to believe that some businesses just get lucky—that success just comes...
17 min read
In life, there are some absolute truths that resonate no matter who or where you are—universal principles that we can al...
12 min read
Small businesses with an aggregated turnover of less than $50 million will be able to claim a bonus deduction equal to 2...
